Key takeaways
- A locked landing door must take 1,000 N at right angles without permanent deformation; on a 900 mm leaf the 1.5 mm skin alone deflects 131 mm, so the load path has to be two folded stiles.
- A 50 x 30 x 1.5 mm stile pair holds that 1,000 N to 0.47 mm at mid-span, which is the number to put on the drawing instead of a skin thickness.
- The rated-load table caps car area at 2.40 m² for 1,000 kg on an electric lift, so car width cannot be chosen before the load is fixed.
- EN 81-20 stops at the lift: component design and test are EN 81-50, fire resistance is EN 81-58, and new lifts in existing buildings are EN 81-21.
A landing door drawing arrives with EN 81-20 written in the title block and no other note. The standard behind that reference runs past 200 pages and governs a whole lift, from the pit ladder to the machine-room access, so it says almost nothing directly about a 1.5 mm door skin. What it does say is measurable: a locked landing door must take 1,000 N applied at right angles at the most unfavourable point without permanent deformation, and a car roof must take 2,000 N over a 300 mm × 300 mm area.
Those two numbers, and perhaps a dozen like them, are all of the standard that reaches a press shop. The rest describes the assembled lift: shaft clearances, refuge spaces, door locking, the electrical safety chain. A supplier who quotes against the cover page rather than the clauses will build a door that looks correct on the bench and fails the type test, and the failure will be blamed on the skin thickness when it is really the frame.
What follows separates the lift-level requirements from the component-level ones, works the door number through to a stile section, and lists what a drawing has to carry so the test is not the first time anyone checks the load path.
What EN 81-20 covers, and where its edge is
EN 81-20:2014 is the safety standard for permanently installed new passenger lifts and goods passenger lifts, with traction, positive or hydraulic drive, serving defined landing levels. It sets requirements for the shaft, the machinery and pulley spaces, the landing and car doors, the car and counterweight, the suspension, the guidance, the safety gear, the buffers, the electrical installation and the control system, and it closes with the examinations and tests before the lift is put into service.
Two things about that scope are easy to misread. The standard is written for a complete lift, not for a part, and its clauses assume a builder who controls the shaft, the pit and the headroom. A door panel, a car sling or a guide-rail bracket inherits only the clauses that name it, and those clauses are quantitative. Everything else is context.
The second is that EN 81-20 is not alone. ISO 8100-1:2019 is a word-for-word adoption of the 2014 text, so a drawing that cites either one points at the same requirements. The 2026 revision, published as EN ISO 8100-1:2026, replaces the 2014 edition and moves the building-related requirements into annexes. Where a customer, a notified body or a national authority still works to EN 81-20, the edition belongs on the enquiry, because a part assessed against one edition may need a fresh look against the other.
The standard stops at four boundaries, and each has an owner:
- Component design and test belong to EN 81-50, now published as ISO 8100-2. Safety gear, governors, buffers, door locks, ropes and guide rails are calculated and tested there, not in the lift standard.
- New lifts in existing buildings are covered by EN 81-21, which accepts reduced dimensions where the shaft cannot be rebuilt.
- Fire resistance of landing doors is EN 81-58, tested against a time-temperature curve rather than a static load. A door leaf can pass the strength clause and fail the fire test.
- The legal route in the EU is Directive 2014/33/EU. The directive sets the essential health and safety requirements; the standard is the accepted way of showing conformity with them.
In India, IS 14665 covers electric traction lifts in four parts and follows the same structure, so a part designed to EN 81-20 usually transfers without a redesign. It still needs a clause-by-clause read, because a national foreword can add a requirement or drop one.
The 1,000 N clause that sizes a landing door
The door strength requirement lands on a sheet metal drawing more often than any other clause. The locked door must withstand 1,000 N applied at right angles at the most unfavourable point without permanent deformation. On a 900 mm wide, 2,000 mm high leaf, that point is the middle of the free edge, next to the lock.
A flat 1.5 mm CRCA skin cannot carry it, and the arithmetic is blunt. Treat the skin as a plate spanning 900 mm between the hinge stile and the lock stile, with its 2,000 mm height acting as the breadth of the section:
I = b t³ / 12 = 2,000 × 1.5³ / 12 = 562 mm⁴
δ = F L³ / 48 E I = 1,000 × 900³ / (48 × 206,000 × 562) = 131 mm
A 131 mm deflection is not a door; it is a drum skin. The skin is a membrane on a frame, and the frame takes the load.
Put a 50 × 30 × 1.5 mm closed section on each vertical edge and the picture changes. That section has I = (30 × 50³ − 27 × 47³) / 12 = 78,900 mm⁴. The load splits 500 N to each stile, and the mid-span deflection becomes:
δ = 500 × 900³ / (48 × 206,000 × 78,900) = 0.47 mm
That is the number to hold. The 1,000 N test is a frame test, and the frame is two folded stiles, a top and bottom rail, and a skin that is allowed to oil-can between them. Specify the stile section and the rail spacing, not the skin gauge, and the door passes.
The load path does not stop at the stile. It continues through the lock keeper, the hinge plates and the shaft-side frame, and any of those with a 2 mm backing plate yields before the stile does. The keeper is the usual weak point, because on many leaves it sits on a single folded return. A 1,000 N push at the free edge puts the whole load through that return as a local bending case, and the return buckles before the stile deflects.
The numbers a component drawing inherits
This is the short list we check when an elevator drawing cites EN 81-20. Values are from the 2014 text; the 2026 revision keeps most of them and relocates the building dimensions. The Ganesh column is what our route can hold, not what the standard permits.
| Parameter | What EN 81-20 sets | Ganesh limit or note | Consequence if missed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Landing door static load | 1,000 N at right angles, no permanent deformation | Leaf frame in 1.5–2.0 mm CRCA, laser-cut and folded; ±0.5 mm typical on the frame | Skin oil-cans, door fails the type test |
| Car roof load | 2,000 N over a 300 mm × 300 mm patch | Roof in 2 mm CRCA with ribs at 300 mm on the 200 T brake | Roof dents under a technician |
| Unlocking zone | 0.20 m above and below the landing level; 0.35 m where car and landing doors are mechanically linked | Lock ramp set from the landing datum, ±1 mm | Door unlocks outside the band, lift will not start |
| Car area for rated load | 1,000 kg allows 2.40 m² on an electric lift; the hydraulic goods table allows 3.60 m² for the same load | Floor panelled to the area on the drawing, not scaled from the car width | Overload setting and rope factor both wrong |
| Refuge space | 0.50 m × 0.60 m standing space, plus buffer and stop distances | Buffer plinth and bracket heights set in the layout | Lift cannot be signed off on site |
| Buffer stroke | 0.135 v² for energy accumulation, 0.0674 v² for energy dissipation, never below 65 mm | Plinth plate 10 mm, laser-cut to the buffer footprint | Pit depth short by 40 mm at 1.6 m/s |
| Suspension safety factor | 12 with three or more ropes, 16 with two | Bought-in rope; termination and sheave beams are ours | Not a sheet metal decision, but it sets the car mass |
| Guide-rail bracket | Designed to EN 81-50 for the safety gear reaction | 6 mm bracket formed on the 200 T brake, capacity to 10 mm | Rail moves when the safety gear engages |
| Landing door fire performance | EN 81-58, tested to a curve | We build the leaf; the fire test runs at an accredited laboratory | A fire claim with no report behind it |
Two entries in that table surprise buyers. The first is the car area: it is a maximum, tied to rated load, and it exists so that a car cannot be built large enough to hold more people than the load is rated for. A 1,000 kg car at 2.40 m² is 417 kg/m²; widen the car to 2.8 m² at the same load and the floor is rated at 357 kg/m², which is below the population density the load assumes. The second is the buffer stroke: it scales with the square of speed, so a 1.6 m/s lift needs 173 mm of oil-buffer stroke against the 135 mm a 1.0 m/s lift needs, and the pit follows.
What the standard forces onto a component drawing
Three assemblies take most of the work, and each has a different failure mode.
Door leaves and frames
EN 81-20 gives no skin thickness, because thickness is a consequence of the frame and the test. What the drawing should carry is the stile section, the skin gauge, the flatness of the gasket land, and the lock keeper position. At 1,200 mm leaf width the 50 × 30 × 1.5 stile deflects 1.1 mm under the same 1,000 N, because deflection goes with the cube of the span. Either the stile deepens to 60 mm or a mid-rail breaks the span. Changing the skin from 1.5 mm to 2.0 mm changes the skin's own stiffness by a factor of 2.4 and the frame's hardly at all, which is why the thicker skin so often fails to fix the problem.
The gasket land matters as much as the strength. A landing door that closes onto a 3 mm bulb gasket needs a land flat within about 0.5 mm over its length, or the gasket loads unevenly, the door bows at the latch and the acoustic and fire performance both drop.
Car slings and platforms
The 2,000 N roof patch is a local load, not a global one. On a 2 mm roof panel with supports at 500 mm centres, a 300 × 300 mm patch at 2,000 N bows the panel visibly; a rib at 300 mm centres carries it without a thicker sheet. The platform is the opposite case: the rated load is global, and the lift maker usually writes a deflection limit of span/1000.
A 1,000 kg load on a 1,600 mm platform between two 100 × 50 × 5 mm channels puts 4,905 N on each channel as a uniformly distributed load, so w = 3.07 N/mm. With I = 1.43 × 10⁶ mm⁴:
δ = 5 w L⁴ / 384 E I = 5 × 3.07 × 1,600⁴ / (384 × 206,000 × 1.43 × 10⁶) = 0.89 mm
That clears span/1000 by 0.7 mm. Drop to a 100 × 50 × 3 mm channel at I = 0.87 × 10⁶ mm⁴ and the same load gives 1.47 mm, still inside the limit but with no margin for the counterweight or a concentrated load at the sill. Platform sections are chosen on deflection, not stress, in almost every case.
Brackets and plinths
Guide-rail brackets and buffer plinths move to EN 81-50, and the bracket load is the safety gear reaction. A 2,100 kg car and load decelerating at 1 g produces 20.6 kN, split across two rails, so 10.3 kN reaches each bracket line. A 6 mm folded bracket with two 120 mm side plates has a section modulus of 28,800 mm³ and sees 36 MPa at a 100 mm standoff, which is 14% of E250 yield. The bracket is not the weak item. The anchor into the shaft wall is, and the standard does not design it.
What Ganesh builds against it
Door leaves, car frames, counterweight frames and guide-rail brackets for TKE and Eros Elevators run through one route. Skins and stiles are cut on the 12 kW fibre laser with its 40 ft × 16 ft bed, formed on the 200 T, 5-axis brake with a 4,450 mm bed, which takes 10 mm and folds a 2,000 mm stile return in a single pass. Frames are welded in fixtures built in our own tool room, on three CLOOS robotic MIG cells or at the manual stations, then finished through seven-tank pretreatment and powder at 80–100 µm.
The checking fixture is where the standard is actually enforced. A leaf is checked for square to within 1 mm on the diagonal, for flatness across the gasket land to 0.5 mm, and for stile-to-stile width to ±0.5 mm before hardware goes on. A 1 mm error on the diagonal becomes a 1.5 mm gap at the lock, and the lock is where the 1,000 N test puts its load.
Parts ship as kits through elevator parts, and the laser cutting capability covers the 0.8–40 mm range these leaves and brackets sit in. The counterweight side of the same lift is set out in the counterweight frame design guide, the leaf detail in the car door panel guide, and the rest of the series in the standards and compliance hub. The type tests are not ours: a door tested to EN 81-20, or to EN 81-58 for fire, is tested by an accredited body on a sample we build, and the report belongs to that build.
What to put on the drawing
- The standard and edition, EN 81-20:2014, ISO 8100-1:2019 or EN ISO 8100-1:2026, plus the clauses the part is designed to meet.
- Leaf size, stile and rail sections, skin gauge, and the flatness of the gasket land.
- The 1,000 N test point and whether the test is on the bare leaf or the assembled door.
- Lock and keeper interface: keeper position, backing plate thickness, and the unlocking zone dimension measured from the landing datum.
- Rated load and car area, so the platform and sling are sized from the table rather than from the car width.
- Roof load patch and the rib spacing that carries it.
- Buffer type, stroke and the plinth height that follows from the pit drawing.
- Finish: pretreatment stages, powder type, DFT, and the faces that must stay bare for bonding.
When EN 81-20 is not the reference
EN 81-20 does not cover builders hoists, which sit under EN 12159; stairlifts under EN 81-40; lifting platforms for persons with impaired mobility under EN 81-41; or mobile elevating work platforms under EN 280. A construction hoist mast section that cites EN 81-20 has the wrong reference, and the load cases, duty rating and test regime are all different.
It is also the wrong citation for a component sold on its own. A safety gear, governor, buffer or door lock placed on the market as a safety component is verified to EN 81-50 and carries its own certificate. Citing the lift standard for that part leaves the certificate question unanswered, and the lift assembler will ask for it.
The third limit is the building. Shaft walls, pit construction, headroom, ventilation and the structural attachment of the guide-rail brackets belong to the building designer. We make the bracket and can drill it to a template; we do not design the concrete, and a drawing that leaves the anchor to us leaves a safety-critical interface with a sheet metal supplier.
Send the door or frame drawing with the edition, the test point and the hardware interface. Request a quote and the engineering team will return the load path, the stile section and the fixture notes with the price.
Frequently asked questions
Does EN 81-20 apply to a goods lift?
Yes, where the lift is a goods passenger lift and people may ride with the load. A goods-only lift that nobody rides has a different duty and a different set of clauses, and the enquiry should say which one it is, because the car area table and the door requirements are not the same.
Is ISO 8100-1 the same as EN 81-20?
ISO 8100-1:2019 is a word-for-word adoption of EN 81-20:2014, so the text is the same and either citation points to the same numbers. The 2026 revision, EN ISO 8100-1:2026, replaces the 2014 edition, so a project should name the edition it is being assessed against.
What thickness should a landing door skin be?
Thickness is a consequence, not a specification. On a 900 mm leaf, 1.5 mm CRCA on a 50 x 30 x 1.5 mm stile reaches 0.47 mm deflection at 1,000 N. At 1,200 mm leaf width the same stile gives about 1.1 mm, and the drawing needs a deeper stile or a mid-rail before it needs a thicker skin.
Who carries out the EN 81-20 tests?
The type tests on doors and the tests before putting a lift into service are carried out by an accredited body or the notified body, not by the fabricator. The fabricator supplies the sample, the dimensional record and the material traceability, and the certificate belongs to that build.
Does EN 81-20 cover the shaft and the pit?
It states the dimensions the shaft must provide, such as refuge spaces and clearances, but the structural design of the walls, floor and headroom is the building designer's responsibility. A guide-rail bracket drawing that leaves the anchor design to the fabricator has left a structural interface unowned.
Sources and further reading
- ISO 8100-1:2019 — Safety rules for lifts, construction and installation · reviewed 3 Nov 2026
- ISO 8100-2:2026 — Design rules, calculations and tests of lift components · reviewed 3 Nov 2026
- Directive 2014/33/EU — Lifts and safety components for lifts · reviewed 3 Nov 2026
Send a door, sling or bracket drawing
Include the standard edition, the test point and the hardware interface. The engineering team checks the leaf frame, the lock keeper and the fixture before quotation.
Request a quote