Calculator · updated 2026-11-03
Sheet metal weight calculator
Part weight from material, thickness and blank size, with density by material and quantity totals.
Inputs
Calculated in your browser. Nothing is sent until you choose to save the result.
Result
6.28 kgper part in crca
| Blank area | 0.400 m² |
|---|---|
| Density used | 7.85 g/cm³ |
| Total for quantity | 6.3 kg |
| Same blank in aluminium | 2.16 kg |
| Same blank in 304 stainless | 6.34 kg |
Uses the blank area. Nominal thickness; mill tolerance changes the real weight.
How this works
The number that travels with the part
Weight is quoted on the drawing, priced on the invoice, charged at the freight desk and checked by the person lifting the crate. The same 500 × 800 mm blank is 6.28 kg in CRCA, 6.34 kg in 304 stainless and 2.14 kg in aluminium, and those three numbers change the material cost by a factor of four before anyone has cut anything.
The formula and why it works
weight (kg) = width (m) × length (m) × thickness (mm) × ρ (g/cm³)
One square metre of sheet, one millimetre thick, is 1,000 cm³. Multiply by density in g/cm³ and the answer is grams per square metre per millimetre, which happens to equal the density in kg/m²/mm. Steel at 7.85 g/cm³ is 7.85 kg per m² at 1 mm, 15.7 kg/m² at 2 mm, and so on.
In millimetres directly:
weight (kg) = W (mm) × L (mm) × t (mm) × ρ / 1,000,000
That form is the one to use for a shaped blank, where the area comes from the CAD flat pattern rather than from a rectangle.
Density by material
| Material | Density (g/cm³) | kg/m² at 1 mm | kg/m² at 2 mm | Ganesh note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRCA, IS 513 | 7.85 | 7.85 | 15.70 | The default for most sheet parts |
| Hot rolled, IS 2062 | 7.85 | 7.85 | 15.70 | Same density, wider thickness tolerance |
| Stainless 304 / 304L | 7.93 | 7.93 | 15.86 | 1% heavier than CRCA |
| Stainless 316 / 316L | 8.00 | 8.00 | 16.00 | Molybdenum adds the extra |
| Stainless 430 | 7.70 | 7.70 | 15.40 | Ferritic, magnetic |
| Aluminium 5052 | 2.68 | 2.68 | 5.36 | Common sheet alloy |
| Aluminium 6061 | 2.70 | 2.70 | 5.40 | Plate and extrusions |
| Brass CuZn37 | 8.44 | 8.44 | 16.88 | Heavier than steel |
| Copper ETP | 8.96 | 8.96 | 17.92 | Heaviest common sheet |
| Zinc coating, Z275 | 7.14 | 0.14 per side | 0.28 per side | Add, do not substitute |
A galvanised sheet is not a different density; it is steel plus a coating. Z275 delivers 275 g/m² of zinc across both faces, so the weight per square metre rises by 0.275 kg regardless of thickness. On 0.8 mm that is a 4% error if it is ignored; on 3 mm it is 1%.
Blank area, not finished area
A laser-cut bracket that removes 35% of its blank still consumes the blank. The material invoice is written on the blank, the scrap still has to be handled and the skeleton still has weight. Use the flat pattern area for material cost and the finished part area only for the weight the customer lifts.
blank mass = flat pattern area × t × ρ
scrap mass = blank mass − finished mass
On a part with a large cut-out, the difference can be 1.5 kg of 2 mm steel per part. At 5,000 parts a year that is 7.5 tonnes of scrap, which is worth tracking and is usually not in the piece price.
Thickness tolerance moves the weight
Sheet is rolled to a thickness tolerance, not to a nominal value. On a 2.0 mm CRCA sheet the permitted range is around ±0.10 mm, which is ±5% of the mass before any density variation is considered.
| Nominal thickness | Cold rolled tolerance | Hot rolled tolerance | Weight spread (cold rolled) | Ganesh note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.8 mm | ±0.06 | ±0.10 | ±7.5% | Coil weight matters here |
| 1.2 mm | ±0.08 | ±0.12 | ±6.7% | Enclosure panels |
| 1.6 mm | ±0.09 | ±0.14 | ±5.6% | Door skins |
| 2.0 mm | ±0.10 | ±0.20 | ±5.0% | The common case |
| 3.0 mm | ±0.14 | ±0.22 | ±4.7% | Frames and gussets |
| 4.0 mm | ±0.17 | ±0.28 | ±4.3% | Base plates |
| 6.0 mm | ±0.22 | ±0.35 | ±3.7% | Heavy brackets |
This is why a weighbridge ticket and a theoretical weight rarely agree to better than 2–3% on a large consignment, and why a supplier quoting on net weight and a supplier quoting on gross weight can appear 5% apart on identical material.
Chargeable weight is not the same as part weight
Freight is charged on the greater of actual weight and volumetric weight. The conversion depends entirely on the mode.
| Mode | Volumetric divisor | 1 m³ equals | When it governs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Air freight | 1 kg per 6,000 cm³ | 167 kg | Light, bulky enclosures |
| Sea LCL | W/M: 1 m³ = 1,000 kg | 1,000 kg | Almost always, for sheet metal |
| Sea FCL | Container payload | 21–28 t per 20 ft / 40 ft | Heavy flat-pack |
| Road, India | Per tonne or per truck | 9–20 t per truck | Local dispatch |
A crate of aluminium canopy panels is the classic case: the metal weighs 107 kg, the crate measures 2.4 m³, and the airline charges for 401 kg. The steel version of the same crate would have been charged on actual weight. Packing density is a design decision with a freight consequence.
Where the weight calculation goes wrong
Four errors account for most of the disagreements. The finished area is used instead of the blank, which understates material by the scrap fraction. One density is used for all stainless, when 304, 316 and 430 differ by up to 4%. Fitted hardware is left out, so a welded frame with hinges, castors, weld nuts and a gas strut weighs more than the sum of its sheet parts. And the nominal thickness is used for a consignment, when the coil may be running at the top of its tolerance.
A fifth error is unit drift. Mixing inches into a millimetre formula, or entering centimetres where millimetres are expected, produces an answer that is wrong by a factor of 1,000 and is usually caught only when the crate is weighed.
Weight sets the handling method
A part above 25 kg stops being a one-person lift and needs two people or a hoist. Above 500 kg the pallet and the forklift become the constraint, and above 1 tonne the lifting points, the crane rating and the centre of gravity all have to be designed rather than assumed. A 2 mm steel panel of 1.5 m² weighs 23.6 kg and is awkward rather than heavy; the same panel in 6 mm weighs 70.7 kg and needs a two-person lift and a proper stillage.
That threshold is worth checking at design stage, because a 0.5 mm thickness change can move a part across it and add handling cost to every operation for the life of the part.
What Ganesh runs
The plant handles 0.8–40 mm thickness across mild steel, CRCA, stainless, aluminium, brass and copper, from 20 T to 300 T presses, a 12 kW fibre laser, and a 200 T brake to 10 mm. Weight per part is quoted for each drawing revision, and it is one of the figures carried forward into packing, crate rating and transport documentation.
See the custom sheet metal fabrication page, the tractor and material handling guides and how material thickness changes laser cutting price for the cost side of the same number.
What to put on the drawing and in the RFQ
- Material grade and density basis, or the mill certificate.
- Nominal thickness and the tolerance you will accept.
- Blank size or flat pattern area, not only the finished size.
- Quantity per release and per shipment.
- Packing method, because crate weight is part of the transport figure.
- Whether the customer needs gross or net weight on the packing list.
Worked example
Blank 500 × 800 mm, thickness 2.0 mm, quantity 1,000.
Step 1 — Area: 0.5 m × 0.8 m = 0.40 m².
Step 2 — CRCA at 7.85 g/cm³: 0.40 × 2.0 × 7.85 = 6.28 kg per part. For 1,000 parts, 6,280 kg.
Step 3 — Stainless 304 at 7.93: 0.40 × 2.0 × 7.93 = 6.34 kg per part, 6,340 kg for the order — 1% heavier and roughly four to five times the material price.
Step 4 — Aluminium 5052 at 2.68: 0.40 × 2.0 × 2.68 = 2.14 kg per part, 2,144 kg for the order. The part is two-thirds lighter because of the material, not the size.
Step 5 — Thickness tolerance on the 2.0 mm CRCA at ±0.10 mm: the mass ranges from 0.40 × 1.90 × 7.85 = 5.97 kg to 0.40 × 2.10 × 7.85 = 6.59 kg, a ±5% band on a nominally identical order.
Step 6 — Shaped part: the flat pattern removes 35% of the rectangle, leaving 0.26 m². Finished mass = 0.26 × 2.0 × 7.85 = 4.08 kg; scrap = 6.28 − 4.08 = 2.20 kg per part, or 2.2 tonnes across the order, still invoiced at the blank weight.
Step 7 — Freight: 1,000 aluminium parts at 2.14 kg = 2,144 kg, packed in 12 crates of 2.4 m³ each. Air volumetric charge = 28.8 m³ × 167 kg = 4,810 kg, so the airline charges for 4,810 kg rather than 2,144 kg.
Assumptions and limits
- Rectangular blank unless a flat pattern area is entered. For a shaped part, use the blank area before cutting.
- Nominal thickness and nominal handbook density. Mill thickness tolerance and alloy composition move the real weight by up to ±5%.
- The calculation gives mass, not cost. Material price per kg is a separate input and changes monthly.
- Freight chargeable weight uses the greater of actual and volumetric weight, with 1 m³ = 167 kg for air and 1 m³ = 1,000 kg for sea LCL.
- Coating mass is excluded; a 70 µm powder film adds roughly 0.10 kg/m², which matters only on very large or very thin parts.
